It's really pretty self-explanatory as I explained my line of reasoning as it follows the law.
The fact is that if you have a child with a man who makes $1,000,000 a year, you are entitled to $350,000 a year of his income at a minimum.
So, I mean, imagine you get paid 35% of whomever knocks you up's income... at what point should you be pursuing motherhood as a career instead of that thing called a job?
Well, say you make $50K/year. You'd be better off if you got knocked up by a man who makes $150K a year if you preferred raising a child to going into work.
There's only upside from there. That's one way to look at it. My view is really a function of the nature of the money earned. If I did not work for it, I don't mind giving it away. The problem with entitlements are when people are entitled to your future work. That might suck if those people were never worth it.
So, make sure they're worth it to you if you're going to go for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment